THE ORIGIN AND USE
Of
THE ROYSTON CAVE
BEING
THE SUBSTANCE OF A REPORT,
SOME TIME SINCE PRESENTED
TO
THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF
ANTIQUARIES.
BY THE LATE
JOSEPH BELDAM, ESQ
F.S.A., F.R.G.S.,
MEMBER OF THE
ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND.
THIRD EDITION
ROYSTON:
PUBLISHED BY JOHN WARREN
M,DCCC,LXXXIV.
THE ROYSTON CAVE.
INTRODUCTION.
MORE than a century has elapsed since a
fortunate accident led to the discovery of one of the most
interesting specimens of antiquity possessed by this or any
other country - the ROYSTON CAVE So great was the curiosity
occasioned by this singular occurrence, that it immediately
gave rise to a warm controversy between two eminent
archaeologists of the day, Dr. William Stukeley and the Rev.
Charles Parkin, in the course of which, though both parties
displayed abundant learning and ingenuity, the cause of
truth suffered much from their mutual loss of temper, and
the too eager desire on both sides to establish a rival
theory. The foibles of these literary combatants have passed
away.And the present age, distinguished, unquestionably,
by a much higher sense of the national value of the
archaeological studies, when rightly conducted, and aided
likewise by a more enlarged experience of archaeological
probabilities, seems to be in a better position to exercise
an impartial and correct judgment on the points disputed.Recent researches also have contributed, in some degree, to
throw additional light on the origin and use of this
remarkable excavation. The result bas been a revival of
curiosity in several quarters, which has ended in a request,
now complied with, to publish the substance of a Report
presented a few years ago to the Royal Society of
Antiquaries. In respect to which paper it need only be
stated, that the desire to flake the subject strictly
popular, has led to the omission of' numerous quotations and
references, which would have encumbered the page, without
adding in equal proportion to the gratification of the
general reader.
THE TOWN OF ROYSTON AND ITS VICINITY.
Our present object being merely a
history of the Cave, any further description of the town and
neighborhood than may be necessary to decide upon the origin
and use of this remarkable excavation must be deemed
superfluous.
A very brief notice of the locality
will suffice for this purpose. The town of Royston stands
partly in Cambridgeshire sad partly in Hertfordshire on a
range of chalk downs which extend through the kingdom from
east to west, and Precisely at the point of junction of two
military roads of great antiquity, which here cross each
other; one called the Ermen Street, commencing, as it is
supposed, on the coast of Sussex, and proceeding through
Stamford and Lincoln, into the northern counties; the other
called the Ikenhilde Street, probably commencing in.
Dorsetshire, and following the chalk downs eastward through
Dunstable and Ickleton, to Ickleham in Suffolk.
Near Royston two vicinal roads ran
parallel. to the Ikenhilde Street, one along the brow of the
hills, and. still called in some parts, the Ridgeway; the
other skirting the northern edge of the downs, and still
known by the name of the Ashwell Way.
The. whole country abounds with
British, Roman, and Saxon antiquities Along the ancient
ways, especially in. the direction of the Ikenhilde Street,
are numerous Roman Military posts, cemeteries and sepulchral
remains, including the Roman Villa and Cemetery at
Litlington; and Roman corns of most of the imperial reigns
are frequently found. Dr. Stukeley and the Rev. Charles
Parkin, both take it for granted that a Roman town or
Station existed on the site of the present town; founding
their opinion on the well known Roman custom of erecting a
station, at the junction of their principal roads. It must
be confessed, however, that this reasoning is not quite
conclusive; and no certain vestiges of Roman habitations can
be affirmed to have been ever discovered.But the absence
of these may, perhaps, be sufficiently accounted for, in so
exposed a country, by the subsequent ravages of Pictish,
Saxon, and Danish invaders, each bent on the destruction of
the works of their predecessors. And some confirmation is
given to the idea of Roman station, by the recent discovery
of several ancient shafts or pits similar to those found at
Chesterford, and other confessedly Roman sites.
Proofs of a successive British and
Saxon occupation, however, are everywhere seen.It cannot
be doubted, that on the beautiful turf around, each of these
ancient races in turn pastured their flocks, celebrated
their games, marshalled their forces, and for very many ages
in succession buried their illustrious dead. Their funereal
mounds still form the most picturesque feature of the
landscape, and, as we shall presently have occasion to
observe, may possibly be able to contest with Lady Rosia
herself the honour of giving their name to the modern town.
But whatever may have been the
antecedent history of the spot, we learn from the celebrated
Camden, that at the time of the Norman Conquest no town
existed here.The place was not even mentioned by name in
Domesday Book. From this, however, we are by no means
obliged to conclude that it was an absolute solitude. We
must bear in mind, that having at that time no parochial
existence, it could not be noticed in the Norman record of
parishes; and all that could be then said was contained in
the recitals. of the various fees and lordships which
extended over it. Something like proof moreover, that the
spot was in fact inhabited by a British tribe, may be
gathered, not only from the innumerable British tumuli in
the vicinity, but from the discovery of various circular
floors and cuttings in the chalk, usually considered to mark
the sites of ancient British dwellings; and evidence of a
Saxon population may be equally inferred from the disclosure
of numerous Saxon graves, both around and within the limits
of the town as well as from the continued usage of a Saxon
appellation to a part of it (the Fleet or flett end), which
seems clearly to indicate one or more habitations on the
spot at a period anterior to the Norman Survey, not
specifically noticed but included, of course, in the general
recitals of Bassingbourne parish, to which they belong.
THE OLD CROSS
At the junction of these two ancient
military roads formerly stood the old cross; and as we shall
probably 'be able to establish a connexion between the Cave
and the Cross it will not be altogether beside our purpose
to offer a few remarks upon the latter. The exact position
of' this venerable monument is not known,: but it may be
presumed to have stood in the south-east angleof the roads
somewhere between the dome of the, Cave and the line of the
Ermen Street, being in the parish of Barkway, and in the fee
of the lordship of Newsells. It may have occupied the site
of an earlier monument, and possibly even in Roman times. It
was certainly the practice of that people to set up a Hermes
at crossways for the guidance and protection of travellers;
and it was not less common among the Saxons to erect a cross
for similar purposes; but the previous existence ofa
monument in this place cannot be carried beyond conjecture.Unfortunately for the question, also, of its Saxon or Norman
origin, the form of the historical Cross cannot now be
determined, the upper part having been long since destroyed.
But the foot-stone, which still exists, is properly
described by Stukeley, as 'a flattish stone of very great
bulk, with a square hole, or mortaise, in the centre,
wherein was let the foot of the upright stone, or tenon,
which was properly the cross.'And this interesting relic,
after several migrations, first to the opposite corner of
the street, were it was seen by Stukeley, and next to the
Market Hill, has lately been removed to the garden of the
Royston Institute.
Camden, who is a great authority on
most questions, but who seems in the present instance to
have contented himself with local tradition, ascribes the
erection of this Cross to 'a famous Lady Rosia, by some
supposed,' he says, 'to have been Countess of Norfolk, about
the time of the Norman Conquest, which Cross,' he adds, 'was
called after her name, Royse's Cross, till Eustace de Marc
founded, just by it, a Priory, dedicated to St. Thomas a
Becket, the 'Martyr of Canterbury; upon which occasion inns
came to be built, and by degrees it became a town, which
instead of Royse's Cross, took the name of Royse's Town,
after wards contracted to Royston.'
An inspection of the earliest deeds
connected with this Priory will shew that Camden was not
quite accurate on that subject; and he may have been misled
as to the origin of the Cross. A great probability
undoubtedly exists, that the earliest proprietors of the fee
of Newsells had something to do, either with its erection or
its restoration; a probability helped by the fact that among
the members and nearest connexions of that noble family
shortly after the Conquest, there actually were several
ladies who bore the name of'Rosia.' But Camden's statement
by no means identifies the lady to whom the Cross, even in
this case, should be ascribed. And, allowing some ground for
the tradition, we should be disposed to refer it to the
elder' Lady Rosia, the wife of Eudo Dapifer, the first
Norman possessor of the fee, and the grandmother, by
marriage, of Dr. Stukeley's heroine, rather than to the
second Lady Rosia, whom he so gratuitously prefers.
There are other writers, however, who,
judging as well from the old Roman and Saxon practice, above
mentioned, as from the internal testimony of the Priory
deeds, and. the probable etymology of ancient words, have
been disposed to attribute a much earlier date to this Cross
Among these, the Rev. Mr Parkins argues, with some force,
that the style and title of the Priory, founded in the
lifetime of the second Lady Rosia, and called after the name
of the Cross, 'De Cruce Roaesie,' certainly imply
that the Cross itself was at that time of considerable fame;
and probably of considerable antiquity. And this Inference
seems strengthened by the local and vernacular name of the
spot, frequently occurring in the earliest Priory deeds, and
latinized into 'Roaesie,' which is, variously spelt' 'Roys,'
'Roes' 'Rous,' and 'Roheys' words which certainly have
much of & Scandi-navian character, and are not so easily
derived from a female Christian name.
Salmon, the antiquary of the county,
adopting a similar view, cites the learned Dane, Olaus
Wormius to prove, that among the northern nations, the
practice of burning, the dead, and heaping a mound over
their ashes, was known
by
DISCOVERY OP THE CAVE, AND ITS
FIRST APPEARANCE.
The Cave was discovered by accident, in
the month of August, 1742, and was almost immediately
afterwards visited by the Rev. George North, of Caldecot, a
member of the Society of Antiquaries, at their special
request. Its position has been already indicated as being in
the south-east, angle of the two main roads, and nearly
below the Cross. In a letter, addressed to the learned
Society in the following month of September, Mr. North
states, that on examination, he had found the Cave, not only
different from what he had apprehended, but from anything he
ever saw before. The workmen, however, had not then reached
the bottom by 8 feet, for which reason he could give but an
imperfect account of it. But by way of illustration, he
enclosed a rough drawing of its appearance at that stage a
copy of which will be seen among the sketches now presented
to the reader. Mr North, after giving a brief description of
the place and the circumstances of the discovery, to which
we shall presently advert, expressed his conviction that the
whole was the work of remote ages, and certainly anterior to
the existence of a town on the. spot. He stated, however
that no relics had as yet been found, except a human skull
and a few decayed bones, fragments of a small drinking cup
of common brown earth, marked with yellow spots, and a piece
of brass without any figure or inscription on it. He added
that there was no tradition in the town to lead to the
design of the excavation.
Dr. Stukeley, the celebrated secretary
to the Society, shortly afterwards went do, and found the
place entirely cleared. He repeated his visit somewhat
later, and made sketches of the interior, which he published
with an account ofthe discovery.But he records the
finding of no additional relics, except a small seal of pipe
clay marked with a fleur-de-lys, which afterwards came into
his possession.
From the respective statements of these
two antiquaries, we learn, that in the year above
mentioned, the town's people had occasion to set down a post
in the Mercat House, which then stood above it, and was used
as a cheese and butter market by the Mercat women. In
digging beneath the bench on which these women were
accustomed to sit, the, workmen struck upon a mill stone
laid underground, at the depth of about a foot, having a
hole in the centre. Finding that there was a cavity beneath,
they tried its depth by a plumb line, which descended 16
feet.This induced them to remove the stone which covered a
shaft of about 2 feet in diameter, with foot holes cut into
the sides, at equal distances and opposite each other like
the steps of a ladder. This shaft we are informed was quite
circular and perpendicular. A boy was first let down into it
and afterwards a slender man, with a lighted candle, who
ascertained that it passed through in opening about 4 feet
in height into another cavity which was filled with loose
earth, yet not touching the wall which he saw to the right
and left. The people now entertained a notion of great
treasure hid in this place, andsome workmen enlarged the
descentThen, with buckets and a well - kirb, they set to
work in earnest to draw up the earth and rubbish. The vast
concourse of people now becoming very troublesome, they were
obliged to work by night, till at length, by unwearied
diligence, after raising two hundred loads of earth, they
quite exhausted it.
And -then fully appeared,' writes Dr.
Stukeley, with the genuine enthusiasm of an antiquary, 'this
agreeable subterranean recess, hewn out of pure chalk. Tis
of an elegant bell - like, or rather mitral form, well
turned, and exactly circular, an observation, however, which
is not quite correct.'The effect,' he goes on to say, -is
very pleasing. The light of the candles scarce reaches the
top, and that gloominess overhead increases the solemnity of
the place.All around the sides, it is adorned with imagery
in basso relievo, of crucifixes, saints, martyrs, and
historical pieces.They are out with & design and 'rudeness
suitable to the time, which was soon after the Conquest.A
kind of broad bench goes quite round the floor next the
wall, broader than a step, and not quite so high as a seat.This bench is cut off in the eastern point by the grave,
which is dug deeper into the chalk.'
The actual appearance of the Cave, at
this period, being of some consequence to our further
enquiries, a few more particulars will be added, respecting
the dome, which does not seem, however, to have undergone
any close examination.Dr. Stukeley, who saw it only from
the bottom, and by candle-light, merely adverts to a piece
of masonry visible near the top, which they who viewed it
near, he says, told him, was made of brick, tile, and stone,
laid in good mortar, and thought it might have been done to
mend a defective part in the chalk, while Stukeley himself
conjectured that it might be the original descent,
afterwards walled up when the second shaft was made. Mr.
North, who made his observations before the cave was
emptied, and therefore from a higher. level, remarks that a
portion of the dome had been either repaired or strengthened
with free-stone and tiles, placed edgeways ; and that almost
opposite the shaft through which he entered, there appeared
the top of an arch, which the workmen imagine way into it
concluding from the narrowness of this shaft that it was
designed only for a vent or air-hole. He also remarks, that
the top or crown work of the dome was curiously composed of.
tile work and within. a foot of the street above and further
that some persons thought a passage ran from the cave to the
priory, a notion which was discredited, however, by Stukeley.
The subsequent discovery of a date in
this part of the cave gives rise to regret that a more
careful inspection and a fuller report had not been made by
the two first visitors. All that we can now gather from
their statements is, that no inscription was then perceived;
that the masonry concealing the supposed passage was at that
time entire; and that the dome had not then been opened to
the surface.Before we pass on to another division of our
subject, it may be right to perpetuate the fact recorded by
Stukeley, that Mr. George Lettis, probably the bailiff of
the manor, and William Lilley, a tailor and salesman, who
lived in the adjoining house, where the chief movers 'in
opening and clearing the place.
SUBSEQUENT ALTERATIONS AND PRESENT
APPEARANCE.
Before we proceed to more recent
investigations, it will be proper to state that, since the
time of Stukeley and North, several changes have occurred,
considerably altering the appearance of the place.
In their day, it will be borne in mind,
the entrance was by a narrow shaft in the northern side of
the Cave.The crown of the dome had not then been pierced,
and the place could only be seen by artificial lights. The
masonry concealing the opening of the shaft on the eastern
side had not been disturbed. And the part which Stukeley
called the grave, had not been made up to the level of the
podium or broad step which encircles the door.
The present entrance is by an arch
opening into the bottom of the Cave, just above the grave,
and on the eastern side; and is reached by means of a
gradually descending passage, 72 feet in length, passing
under the Ikenhilde Street, which was cut through the solid
chalk, in the year 1790, by Thomas Watson, a bricklayer, who
occupied the Town House, on the opposite side, and who
employed his workmen during a hard winter in accomplishing
this difficult task. A glimmering light is now also admitted
through a grated opening in the dome, which was probably
made at the same time.And, either then, or at some other
time unknown, the masonry closing the arch on the eastern
side of the doom was broken down, plainly exposing another
shaft, which now appears above.
The design of affording greater
facilities for the inspec-tion of the Cave, was, by these
means, accomplished; and the labour and expense of the
projector, were, in the sequel, amply repaid.Among the
numerous distinguished personages who have since visited it,
may be mentioned the late King of the French, Louis XVIII,
induced, possibly, by Stukeley's description of the
historical figures, to pay this homage to the memory of his
ancestor, Louis VII. And many individuals are still living,
who remember the patriotic zeal and comical effect with
which the old Widow Watson, as pythoness of the Cave, was
accustomed to descant on the exploits and piety of its
heroes and heroines, mixing up the legends of saints with
the fables of Stukeley, and confidently supporting her
statements, by quotations from history, which she humorously
called the 'Book of Kings.-
LATER EXAMINATION AND FURTHER
DESCRIPTION.
hi the year 1852, a fresh and more
careful examination of the Cave was made by Mr. Beldam,
assisted by his friend, Mr. Edmund Nunn, the honorary
curator of the Royston Museum: and from a manuscript report,
afterwards presented to the Antiquarian Society, we select
the following particulars.
The height of the Cave from the floor
to the top of the dome, is about 25.5 feet; the length of
the aperture leading. up to the surface is about 2 feet;
making together, with the thickness of the crownwork at the
top of the dome, about 28 feet. The bottom is not quite
circular: the widest diameter being from east to west.The
diameter from north to south is about 17 feet, and from east
to west about 17 feet 6 inches, the difference being
occasioned by the groove of the eastern shaft, which
descends this side, and has not been accurately worked into
the circle.
The broad step, or podium, which
surrounds the floor, is octagonal, and is about 8 inches in
height, by 3 feet in width, being now carried over the part
which Stukeley calls grave, upon which is now likewise
placed an Ancient millstone,probably the same that closed
the shaft discovered in 1742.
About 8 feet above the floor a cornice
runs round the walls, cut in a reticulate4 or diamond
pattern, about 2 feet in breadth, and receding, as it rises,
about 6 inches; making the diameter of the lower part of the
dome, which springs from it, about 18 feet. The cornice is
not, however, continued over the grave, but descends with a
curve on one side, leaving the space above it unornamented
and in its original rude condition Almost the whole circle
between the podium and the cornice has been sculptured in
low relief, as described by Stukeley, with crucifixes,
saints, martyrs, and historical pieces; and many of these,
if not all, have been coloured.Vestiges of red, blue, and
yellow, are visible in various places; and the relief of the
figures has been assisted by a darker pigment Above the
cornice, rude figures and heraldic devices are also here and
there cut or scratched into the chalk, but none in relief.
In different parts of the Cave, both above and below the
cornice, deep cavities, or recesses, of various forms and
sizes, some of them oblong and others oven-shaped, are
irregularly cut into the wall, closely resembling
olla-holes, niches, and recesses, usually seen in Roman,
Etruscan, and Phenician tombs.One of these cavities above
the cornice is about 4 feet 6 inches in length, by about 2
feet 6 inches in height; and another in a similar
position, about 2 feet 6 inches in length, with a
corresponding height. Besides which, innumerable small
crosses, perforations, and un-intelligible devices are
discernible in all directions.
Immediately above the grave, at the
height of about 17 feet appears the masonry, supposed by
Stukeley and North to have concealed the original entrance.The two lower courses only of this masonry now remain,
formed of blocks of chalk neatly chiseled, and coloured red,
giving them the appearance of brickwork. The shaft is seen
above them, here impinging on the dome, and still partially
filled with earth, which, oil examination, was found to be
mixed with snail fragments of the bones of animals, and a
few pieces of medieval pottery, but no human bones. The
perpendicular course of the shaft, proved that it formed no
portion of a passage leading to the Priory.
The inspection of this part of the Cave
was accomplished by means of ladders and torch-light; and
led to the discovery of certain numerical figures carefully
and artistically cut into the end block of the upper course,
giving the date of '1347,' which, if genuine as their
appearance certainly indicates, may assist in tracing the
transition through which Arabic numerals have passed in this
country; and furnish evidence of the continued use of the
crypt. Below this masonry, the shaft evidently expanded as
it descended to the grave; and the chalk in this part of the
Cave never having been dressed to correspond with the
surrounding surface, exhibits, as already stated, the marks
of an extreme and primeval antiquity.
THE GRAVE.
The grave being opened, was found to
range exactly with the shouldering of the shaft above.Its
length proved to be about 7 feet 6 inches; its depth below
the floor about 2 feet; and its width about 3 feet. To a
certain depth it had been evidently disturbed, but the
bottom had never been moved. It was found to contain a
variety of objects, which, had they been seen by Stukeley,
must have sadly disconcerted his theory of the origin and
use of the place. Among these may be mentioned, first,
as being nearest the surface, fragments of red bricks,
described by him, as enclosing the grave, not improbably
Norman or Early English; and others somewhat more Roman in
their character. Marks of cremation appeared on several of
these as well as in other parts of the grave. Secondly,
fragments of oak of great thickness, studded with large
clout headed nails, and pieces of iron, apparently, the
mountings of a small oblong chest.Thirdly, a rude iron
instrument, probably used for holding a light, and various
pieces of iron much corroded. Fourthly, a large lump of
charcoal, powdered with Sulphur. Fifthly, intermixed with
the above, a large quantity of the bones of animals; but
none of them human. Specimens of these being submitted to
Professors Owen and Quekett, were pronounced to be of the
kind usually found in bone shafts and British graves; such,
for instance, as bones of the ox, the hog, the hare, and the
goat or sheep. In the lowest stratum, which required the
pick - axe to move it, were found the bones of a young deer;
and the vertebrae of a small fish. There were, moreover,
many spherical stones, of the class called 'aetite,' or
'eagle stone,' known also to the ancients as the 'lapis
pregnans,' and believed by them to be endowed with medicinal
and magical properties; and, finally, fragments of glass, of
leather, of wood, and some other articles of doubtful
character.
ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION AND PURPOSE OF
THE CAVE.
Au attentive consideration of the
articles found in the grave, even supposing a few of them to
have been subsequently introduced, fully verified the
presumption raised by the peculiarly crippled and time-worn
aspect of the wall above, that the so-called grave was
nothing more than a continuation below the floor, of the
ancient eastern shaft; and it consequently furnished a
probable clue to the subsequent formation and original
design of the whole.It seemed clear, that this shaft, in
connexion with that on the northern side of the Cave,
discovered in 1742, and of which the traces downward are
visible as low as the floor, was the original excavation,
and that from one or both of these, by the same, or by
successive operations, one or more primitive chambers were
horizontally opened, which at length as-sumed the form of
the present Cave.It might be reasonably inferred, that
this process began from the eastern shaft, with the upper
part of the dome, and, judging from the large and deep
niches cut in this part, it might be also presumed that the
floor of the first excavation was but a little below them.
The lower half Of the Cave, on this supposition, with its
numerous niches and recesses, was sunk at a later period. A
method similar to this may be observed in the shafts and
sepulchral chambers recently discovered at Stone.
The subject, however, of ancient shafts
and subterranean chambers deserves a little further
consideration.
The formation of shafts seems common to
all ages and countries. They were opened for mining, for
sanitary, for ceremonial, and for sepulchral purposes. Man
seems to have been always a burrowing animal. But their most
common use was, probably, always sepulchral; either for the
purpose of actual interment, or as a means of access to
chambers intended for that object. Thus the Egyptians often
buried their dead in shafts.The tombs of the Seythians, as
recent discoveries in the Crimea have shown and likewise
those of the old Etruscans, were commonly approached by
means of shafts. The interment of the poor at Rome in shafts
or wells, called 'puticoli,' gave an historical celebrity to
the Esqulline Hill And even when not designed to contain the
ashes of the dead, they seem to have been frequently
employed to deposit the embers of the funereal fire, the
bones of the funereal feast, the pottery used and broken on
these and other sacred occasions; and some-times, also for
the ornaments and relics of the departed.
Allusion has been already made to the
existence of ancient shafts at Royston; and many others have
been discovered in different parts of the kingdom. Among
them may be specially mentioned those at Ewell in Surrey, at
Boxmoor in IIertfordshire, at Stone in Buckinghamshire, at
Chadwell in Essex, at Crayford in Kent, and numbers more
recently opened by the present Lord Braybrooke at
Chesterford.The contents of most of them seem clearly to
prove a Romano-British origin, and a sepulchral or religious
purpose.But the indications at Royston are not so
decisive, though of a similar kind. The objects found in the
shaft at the Cave create some uncertainty also, as to its
original design, and make it doubtful whether its first
purpose was a place of deposit or a means of access only to
the chamber beyond; for if the latter, we must conclude that
it was afterwards accommodated to the ulterior purpose of
the Cave. What that purpose was has yet to be considered.
Excavated chambers of this kind appear
to have been as common and as various in their use as the
ancient shafts. They were adapted to the habits, customs,
and necessities of the different countries where they are
found in our own country, and among its earliest
inhabitants, we learn from the ancient historians that they
were most commonly used, either as places of refuge and
concealment, or for the deposit of grain and' other stores;
but it was not the ordinary practice of the Celts and
Scandinavians to bury in them.Any sepulchral application,
therefore, must be presumed to have occurred in a
Romano-British period. In most other countries, however,
their principal object appears to have been always
sepulchral; and they were so used, either with or without
the accompaniment of the shaft. Both kinds abound in Egypt,
in Palestine, in the Crimea, in Etruria, and in most other
parts of the Roman Empire.
Hence the original purpose of the
Royston Cave, if of purely British origin, could scarcely
have been sepulchral. It bears, indeed, a strong
resemblance, in form and dimen-sion, to the ancient British
habitation; and certain marks and decorations in its oldest
parts, such as indentations and punctures, giving a diapered
appearance to the surface, arc very similar to what is seen
in confessedly Druidical and Phenician structures.But this
by no means militates against the probability of its
subsequent appropriation to the use of a Roman sepulchre.
The Roman underground sepulchres, it is
true, were not generally of a conical form, but nothing was
more common with them than to appropriate the designs and
devices of a conquered people.Mr. Akerman, the present
learned Secretary of the Antiquarian Society, in a recent
paper in Archaeologia, vol. xxxiv, p.27, on the Roman
remains at Stone, and which contains references to most of
the other shafts to be met with in this country, expresses a
firm conviction that the Royston Cave was at one time a
Roman sepulchre.He quotes also an instance of a similar
sepulchre, discovered many years since on the Aventine hill
at Rome; the only difference of form in that case being,
that the shaft entered at the top of the dome, instead of at
the side. Few persons, indeed, who have a fresh recollection
of the old Tombs of Italy, with their niches and recesses
for urns, and cists and lamps, and votive offerings-their
ornamented cornices, and benches for the repose of the dead
will fail to discover in the Royston Cave marks of similar
design and similar uses. Nor will the disappearance of the
many funereal objects it may once have contained in any
considerable degree lessen the probability, after so long a
dedication to the purposes of Christian worship.
COMPARISON WITH ORIENTAL CAVES.
Admitting this general resemblance,
however, It must still be confessed, that among the ancient
sepulchres of Europe, there are none which correspond
exactly with the Royston Cave; and whether its present form
existed in Roman times, or is the result of more recent
modifications, we are led to conclude that its precise model
was, most probably, derived from the East; a conclusion
which need not at all disturb our belief in its early Roman
occupation.
It is certain that ancient caves do
exist in Palestine, which, in form and circumstance, and to
some extent also in decoration, approximate so nearly to the
Royston Cave, that if any historical connexion could be
established 'between them, it would scarcely seem doubtful
that the one is a copy of the other. Such a connexion we
shall now endeavour to show, possibly even in Roman times,
but more certainly at a later period.
The caves in question are fully
described by Professor Robinson, of America, in his
Biblical Research vol. II, p.353 et seq. He there
states, that in the vicinity of Deir Dubban, at no great
distance from Gaza and Askelon, where the soil scarcely
covers the chalky rock, he visited certain eaves, excavated
into the form of tall domes or bell-shaped apartments,
ranging in height from 20 to 30 feet; and in diameter from
10 or 12 to 20 or 30 feet or more. The top of these domes
usually terminates in a., small circular opening for the
admission of light and air.These dome-shaped caverns, he
adds, are mostly in clusters, three or four together. They
are all hewn regularly. Some of them are ornamented, either
near the bottom or high up, or both, with rows of small
holds or niches, like pigeon holes, extending quite round.
And in one of the caves he observed crosses cut into the
walls. In like manner, at Beit Jibrin, he saw numerous caves
of a similar form, cut into the same chalky soil.In one
cave he also remarked a line of ornamental work about 10
feet above the floor, resembling a sort of cornice; and the
whole hill appeared to have, been perforated with eaves of a
similar kind; They seemed, he says, to be innumerable in
that neighbourhood. It must be borne in mind that Dr.
Robinson, in describing these caves, could scarcely have
known of the existence of that at Royston. He does not
pretend to decide on their age or use. His acquaintance with
such subjects appears, indeed, from other parts of his work,
to have been limited; but he suggests that they may have
been inhabited by a colony of Edomites; from the resemblance
they bear to some excavations at Petra.It is, at least,
certain that the descendants of Esau did occupy this
district several centuries before the Christian sera; and
Herod the Great was born at Askelon.
But any historical connexion with the
Royston Cave must be sought for at a later period. It may
possibly be found in the circumstance that these caves were
in the vicinity of the ancient city of Eleutheropolis, and
that after the Roman conquest they were almost certainly
used as columbaria or cemeteries by the inhabitants. This
city is known to have been one of those most highly favoured
by the Emperor Severus, during his successful administration
of the East. The Empress Julia was also a native of that,
part of the empire. Assuming, then, that the form of the
Royston Cave has undergone no change since Roman times, it
does not seem wholly improbable, that, as this emperor spent
so much of his after life in Britain, the Royston Cave may
owe its existence to the officers of some veteran legion,
who may have accompanied him to this country, and may have
been quartered at one of the military posts in this
neighbourhood.At any rate, numerous coins of this emperor
and his family, as well as moulds for coining, found in this
vicinity, show how closely the country was occupied by the
Romans at that period.
If, on the other hand, we conclude that
the form of the Royston Cave has undergone some change since
those imperial times, we shall be able to find other and
still stronger probabilities of its connexion with the
Oriental caves at a later period. Perhaps no stronger
argument can be advanced, than the fact that the district in
which these caves abound, was one of the great battlefields
of the early Crusaders.It was here that they built their
famous fortresses of El Hasi and Blanche Garde; and the
country all around was the scene of the adventures and
triumphs of Richard Coeur de Lion, and his puissant
chivalry. Again, whatever may have been the former purpose
of these caves they must, at a period subsequent to the
Christian era, when Palestine swarmed with anchorites, have
become, in all probability, like most other grottos and
tombs in that country,-the abode of hermits and recluses;
and, as such, must have been known and respected by the
Christian leaders.It seems most natural, therefore, to
trace this singular correspondence of form to the piety of
some distinguished Crusader, anxious on his return to his
own country to perpetuate the memory of former exploits, and
to exhibit his devotion in a manner most accordant with the
ideas and superstitions of his age.
CONVERSION INTO A CHRISTIAN ORATORY.
However we may decide on these points,
it is certain that a time did arrive when the Cave became
appropriated to Christian worship; and it is to the period
of the early Crusades that this change may be most
reasonably referred. In that age, the attention of all
Europe was directed towards the East. Everything was deemed
sacred which came from that region. The ecclesiastical
structures and practices of the day, borrowed largely from
eastern models; and no greater act of piety could then be
imagined than the founding and endowing oratories and
hermitages, resembling those which bad been devoutly visited
and venerated in the Holy Land.
Now, among the Christian Knights who
fought most gallantly on the plains of Askelon and Gaza,
were some of the descendants and near connections of Eudo
Dapifer, Lord of the Manor of Newsells.
With this period, also, most nearly
agrees the style of its principal decorations. And the
greater part of its sculptures, so far as we can understand
them, appears to belong to the same age.
Connecting these circumstances
together, a strong presumption appears to be raised, that
the ultimate design and ornamentation are due to some noble
member of the early Newsells family; and though we are
obliged to reject Dr. Stukeley's visionary notion of Lady
Rosia's personal share in this business, there is some
reason to' believe that the work may be mainly ascribed to
the devotion and liberality of one of her sons, probably
William de Magnaville, her favourite son, a companion in the
exploits of King Richard, and one of his most gallant
comrades in the wars of Palestine.But the story of Lady
Rosia's subsequent retirement to 'this oratory, and of the
execution of the sculpture with her own hand, is purely
imaginary; and the fiction of her interment in this place is
contradicted by the best historical evidence.
DECORATIONS OF THE ORATORY.
It has already been stated that the
entire space between the cornice and the floor, with the
exception of the part down which the eastern shaft descends,
has been decorated with sculptures, representing crucifixes,
saints, martyrs, and historical personages. These do not
seem t6 have been all executed by the same person, nor,
probably, at precisely the same time; but all of them,
notwithstanding their rude and inartificial manner, produce
a striking effect. And most, if not all of them, have been
coloured, though perhaps at a later period. The only
sculptures in this country that can be compared to them, are
certain effigies carved into the chalk walls of the castle
at Guildford, in Surrey, which are likely to have been of
the same period.
Before we proceed to describe the
principal groups, we shall offer a few preliminary remarks
on their probable age, under the head of Costumes, Armour,
Architectural Designs, and Heraldic Devices.
1.On the subject of costumes,
particularly the head-dresses of the ladies, Stukeley and
Parkin disagree, the former assigning them, as we think
correctly, to the twelfth century the latter to the
fourteenth or fifteenth. It must be admitted, that similar
costumes prevailed at both periods, and the question must,
therefore, be rather decided by the probable import of the
stories to which they belong. In like manner, the helmets in
general, and the coiffures of the men afford no certain
criterion; though several of them are certainly of a
crusading age. The crowns, coronets, and mitres of Royal
personages and prelates, are of a very antique form; but
they may have been somewhat modified by the fancy of the
artist.
2. The Armour in general seems
antecedent to the period when the whole person was cased in
steel; and, together with the absence of beards, appears to
indicate the fashion of the twelfth or thirteenth century.
3. The Architectural Designs,
which are few, are of the Norman and Early English
character.
4The Heraldic Devices, in the
opinion of competent judges, of the Herald's College,. to
whom they have been submitted, belong to an age anterior to
the general use of family badges, and may consequently be
assigned to the, eleventh or twelfth century.The
kite-shaped and small circular shields can hardly belong to
a later period.
Before we quit this head, we must,
however, advert to a particular shield, which became the
subject of hot dispute between Stukeley and Parkin; the
former claiming it, for a Beauchamp, the father of Lady
Rosia's second husband, the latter, for a much later member
of the same family. The old story of the battle of the
shield was here revived; but in this ease, instead of both
knights being in the right, both were in the wrong, both
evidently mistaking the device about which they quarrelled.
There is, perhaps, more excuse for Parkin, who, for aught we
can gather, never entered the Cave. The fact, however, is,
that the six cross crosslets in dispute, appear to be simply
two letters, 'H. K.,' above the fess, with a Calvary cross
beneath it.
The general result of this preliminary
survey-admit ting the possible existence of some later
interpolations appear strongly to favour the conclusion
above stated, that' the principal sculptures are of the age
of Henry II and Richard I.
EXPLANATION OF THE SCULPTURES.
The various groups and figures we are
now about to describe are irregularly distributed; they are
of different sizes; refer to different subjects; are
probably the, production of different artists and exhibit
little unity of design. They harmonize chiefly by their
general air of antiquity, and the quaintness which belongs
to the efforts of a rude and superstitious age.
Several shrines' adorn this oratory.
The high altar, contrary to the usual practice, is on the
western side. The shrine, and the legend of Saint Katharine,
who appears to have been the patron saint of the place, are
on the right and left of the high altar. The shrine of St.
John Baptist and St. Thomas a Beckett (the patron saints of
the Priory,} is on the southern side. The northern side
exhibits the shrine and the legend of St. Christopher.The
space between the effigy of St. Katharine and certain
historical figures on the south - western side, is occupied
by the effigies of St. Lawrence, St Paul, the Holy Family,
and the Flowering Cross.Various historical personages and
scenes fill up the intervals; and the eastern side is the
only part which appears to have been left without
decoration.
We shall consider these sculptures in
the following order.
I - THE HIGH ALTAR.
The oldest and most venerated object
must, of course, have been the High Altar. It is represented
by a square tablet sunk in the wall, on which is carved the
scene of the crucifixion; our Saviour extended on the cross,
the Virgin Mary on one side, and the beloved disciple on the
other; a heart and a hand is cut on either side; the heart
nearest the Virgin being composed of three lines, as
indicative of most intense affection. The moulding of the
tablet appears to have been removed at the bottom, to make
room for the effigies of two royal persons, and a smaller
crucifixion, which will be afterwards described. On the foot
of the principal cross is cut a saltire or St. Andrew's
cross.
The position of this altar, in the
west, instead of the east of the oratory, has given rise to
much speculation. Stukeley supposes it to have been placed
here, in order to correspond, as nearly as possible,
with the cross erected above.; thus' enabling the worshipper
to do homage to both at the same time. Another reason might
be suggested by the necessity of leaving undisturbed the
original entrance into the Cave which was most probably by a
ladder or steps descending from the eastern shaft; and that
portion of the Cave may, also, have been thought to be
desecrated by its original pagan use.
II. ST. CHRISTOPHER
In describing the several groups, we
will begin with those on the right hand of the modern
entrance, which occupy the northern side of the Cave.
Immediately beyond the projecting
shoulder of the eastern shaft, appears a group, consisting
of two half length personages above one of them a female,
the other a male clad in a toga or pallium; a large figure
is seen kneeling on one knee beneath them, as If in the act
of receiving a burden; and a small figure, almost: effaced,
is bestriding his neck. These figures have been painted red,
and appear to represent Joseph and Mary placing the infant
Saviour on the neck of St. Christopher, who is preparing to
cross a river.The river is represented by the groove of
the northern shaft, which descends here, and appears to have
been scored to imitate running water.
On the other side of the river, St.
Christopher appears as a gigantic personage, in a short
garment tucked up, and a huge staff in his hand still
carrying the infant Saviour on his shoulder. This figure is
almost identical in form with that cut into the chalk at
Guildford Castle. At an early period, the effigy of St.
Christopher was introduced into Christian churches The
legend was brought from the East by the Crusaders, and the
saint having been a hermit, found an appropriate place in
this oratory. He is represented to have been a Syrian or
Canaanite, of enormous bulk, who, after his conversion,
built himself a cell by the side of a river, and employed
his great stature for the glory of God, in carrying pilgrims
across. The superstition of the age assigned to him the
special privilege of preventing tempests and earthquakes.
His effigy was usually placed near the entrance of sacred
buildings, as symbolical of baptismal admission to the
Christian faith. There seems nothing unreasonable in
supposing, with, Stukeley, that these figures were cut about
the year A.D. 1185, when there happened a terrible
earthquake, such as was never known before in this country,
followed by an eclipse of the sun, great thunderings,
lightnings, and tempests, dreadful fires, and destruction of
men and cattle. This saint being once on his travels is
reported to have struck his staff into the ground, which, in
token of the truth of his doctrine, took root, and produced
both flower and fruit.
We shall have occasion to remark a
flowering staff, or cross, on the other side of the high
altar, which Stukeley imagines, though perhaps incorrectly,
has reference to this prodigy. Above the figure of St.
Christopher is the entrance discovered by the town's people
in 1742.
III. LEGEND OF ST. KATHARINE THE
MARTYR.
Next to St. .Christopher is the legend
of St. Katharine of Alexandria. It is related of this virgin
and martyr, that being imprisoned by a cruel tyrant for
twelve days without food, a dove was sent down by Providence
to administer to her necessities. Her prison is here
represented by a recess cut into the wall, and painted of a
dark blue colour, which still remains. She first appears at
the entrance, in a disconsolate position, and in a dress of
yellowish hue. At the farther end of the prison, she again
appears, lying on her back, her head placed on a pillow
marked with a heart, and her whole person resting on a
colossal arm and hand, painted in red, and engraved with a
heart. It is presumed that. these are symbols of her piety
and dependence on Providence.Above the prison, appears the
same out-stretched arm and hand, in the act of letting, fly
a dove, which hovers over the prisoner, with a wallet in its
bill The latter emblems are out into the chalk, but not in
relief, and have been likewise painted rod. Below the prison
are two deep oven-shaped cavities of unequal sizes; one of
them having a groove out into the floor. They resemble other
niches in different parts of the Cave, and were, probably,
first designed for sepulchral deposits; but in Christian
times, they were appropriated to the service of the oratory
and were most likely used as piscinae for the high altar,
and as niches for lights, on St. Katharine's day, and other
great festivals. Parkin has singularly mistaken the figure
in prison for that of a man, and supposes the whole to
represent the entombment of the Saviour, and Mary Magdalene
waiting at the entrance.
Next in succession, comes the High
Altar, already described.
IV. EFFIGY OF ST. KATHARINE.
Immediately beyond the High Altar,
appears the figure of St. Katharine in her beatified form,
erect, holding the wheel, the instrument of her passion, in
her right hand, and wearing a lofty crown, as being of the
blood royal of Egypt. There is something singularly
imaginative and spectral in this effigy. Occupying the place
of honor in the oratory, we are led to conclude, that to
this sainted lady, it was chiefly dedicated a conclusion
rather confirmed by the existence of an ancient inn close
by, still called the 'Katharine Wheel,' where we may presume
that pilgrims who came to honour her shrine were accustomed
to resort, and end their devotions in the usual orthodox
manner. Stukeley ascribes the preference shewn to St.
Katharine in this oratory, to a great victory obtained by
the Crusaders over Saladin and Ms hosts, on the plains of
Ramleh, on St. Katharine's day, 25th November, 1177; and as
the celebrated William de Magnaville, Lady Rosia's son, and
lord in capite of this manor, was present on that
memorable occasion, the conjecture seems by no means
improbable.
V. THE CROSS OF ST. HELENA.
Moving round in the same direction, the
next object probably represents the Cross of St. Helena, the
mother of Constantine the Great. Stukeley imagines it to be
the staff of St. Christopher, commonly called the Palmer's
Staff But as the pretended discovery of the true cross by
the first Christian princess, must have been deemed an event
of greater consequence to the Romish church, than the
private adventures of any respectable saint; and as the
singular property ascribed by monkish writers to this cross,
of perpetually renewing itself, seems aptly symbolized by
the production of buds and flowers, we are disposed to
conclude, that the 'Invention' of the cross is here
represented.
VI. THE HOLY FAMILY.
Beyond the cross, the figures divide
into two lines. In the upper line, nearest St. Katharine,
appears the Holy Family-Joseph, the Virgin, and the youthful
Saviour. The leading idea of pilgrimage, is here again
portrayed; and this group, most likely, represents the
journey from Jerusalem, after the feast of the Passover.
VII ST. LAURENCE.
In the same line to the left, is the
effigy of St. Laurence with the instrument of passion in his
hand. He wears a long garment, marked with a heart at the
bottom. On his breast are cut two letters, I S, of somewhat
doubtful antiquity. This saint suffered martyrdom in the
reign of Gallienus, at Rome, and his death is celebrated on
the l0th of August. The date is of considerable importance,
as it will probably furnish the key to some of the
historical portraits hereafter to be described.
VIII. CONVERSION OF ST. PAUL.
Immediately below the Holy Family, in
the second line, appears a horse overthrown and resting on
its haunches, a man unhelmed, and still holding by the
bridle, but in the act of falling, and a small circular
shield, with a sword of extravagant length, flying from him.
Stukeley naturally concludes this to mean the conversion of
St. Paul, kept on the 25th of January; and the length of the
sword may be simply intended to remind the observer of the
manner of his death. Parkin, however, rather absurdly as we
think, discovers in this group the martyrdom of St.
Hippolite, who was torn asunder by wild horses.
We can scarcely doubt, that the primary
allusion here was to St. Paul.But it may have been
subsequently degraded into a satire on the family of William
'Long Epee,' or 'Long Sword.'This personage
was allied by marriage to Lady Rosia, but opposed in
politics to her family, and detested, both by priests and
laity, for his inhumanity and sacrilege, in asserting the
rights of King John. The clerical historians of the time,
inform us, that the first long Epee died an unnatural death:
the second perished in Palestine: and the last of his race,
being unhorsed and indelibly disgraced at a great
tournament, held in the year 1250, died despised and young.
It seems not impossible, that the monks of the Priory, with
a mixture, by no means uncommon, with superstition and
buffoonery, may have contrived, by lengthening the sword,
and somewhat distorting the original figure, to make their
devotion subserve their revenge, in perpetuating the
disgrace of a fallen enemy.
IX. WILLIAM THE LION, KING OF SCOTS.
In the same line with St. Paul, and
immediately below the effigy of St. Laurence, appears the
half-length figure of a royal personage, wearing an antique
crown, and with arms extended, in an attitude of surprise
and alarm. On the breast are cut the ancient initials, 'WR';
and the position, next to the falling saint, may not have
been without its meaning. This figure seems to form part of
an historical series, commencing on the southern side of the
Cave.We shall postpone our reasons for considering it the
portrait of William the Lion, until we reach it again from
the other side.
We now return to the entrance, and take
the groups in succession to the left.
The figures on this side of the Cave,
are, for some distance, nearly effaced. Not far from the
entrance are two deep recesses, probably, at first, intended
for sepulchral uses, but subsequently devoted to some
purpose of the Christian oratory. The first figure that can
be traced, is that of a person holding a ball, or globe, in
his right hand; on the meaning of which we offer no
conjecture.
X. QUEEN ELEANOR.
The next is the half-length figure of a
royal lady in a cloister or cell, which forms part of an
ecclesiastical edifice, of Anglo-Norman or Early English
architecture. The lady wears a crown, but has the air of
being a prisoner; and probably represents Queen Eleanor, the
wife of Henry II, who, in consequence of her intrigues and
violence, was imprisoned by her husband for many years, and
only liberated on the accession of her son, Richard I, Coeur
de lion. Parkin, however, supposes this figure to represent
St. Katharine in prison. Our reason for differing from him
will presently appear.
XL. THE SHRINE OF ST. JOHN BAPTIST AND
ST. THOMAS A BECKET.
Next to the royal prisoner, and only
separated from her by a royal standard, and a figure, which
probably represents the standard bearer, is the shrine of
the two patron saints of the Priory Church, St. John Baptist
and St. Thomas a Becket.Above the Shrine-which is a tablet
sunk in the wall, and over the head of the Baptist, is a
crucifix. St. John is represented as a venerable Personage,
bare - headed, and wearing a forked beard; of which this is
the only instance in the Cave, except that of the Saviour,
at the high altar. The figure is of three-quarters length,
the legs being merely scratched into the chalk, and possibly
intended to appear as standing in the water. He wears a
short tunic, and holds in his left hand, towards the figure
of St. Thomas, a crown, surmounted by three drooping
tendrils, probably indicating the palm and crown of
martyrdom. St. Thomas is represented as a prelate of high
degree, clothed in full canonicals, and wearing a lofty
conical cap, or mitre. He holds in his right hand a globe,
surmounted by a cross, and in his left a staff-crosier. An
altar, marked with a cross, is cut into the space between
these two saintly personages.
Stukeley supposes them to represent the
Cardinal Octavian, as legate from the Pope; and Hugh de
Nunant, King Henry's chaplain, on a mission for the purpose
of crowning his son John, King of Ireland. Another
construction is, that the bearded man represents the Grand
Master of the Hospitallers, bearing the royal standard and
regalia of Jerusalem, attended by Heraclius the Patriarch ;
both these dignitaries having been deputed in the year 1185,
to make a tender of the sovereignty of the Holy Land to
Henry II., on condition of his hastening to its rescue from
the Saracens. There seems some probability in this
explanation. But on the whole we agree with Parkin, that it
represents the Shrine of the two patron saints of the
Priory; a confirmation of which is found in its historical
connexion with the figures that follow, and likewise in the
position of the cavity or niche beneath, which has certainly
been used as a piscina.
XII. KING HENRY II.
The formidable personage immediately
beyond the shrine is evidently the hero of the Cave. He is
presumed to be Henry II the reigning monarch of the time. He
wears a low-crowned helmet; and a tabard girt about the
waist, marked with a large cross on the breast, and a
smaller one on either side. He holds a drawn sword in his
right hand. Above him appears an array of troops; and
further on are two other bodies of troops, headed by a
prelate in a marshal vest, and wearing a peculiar kind of
mitre; who seems to be offering an address, from behind a
battlement or a pulpit. The person of the King, as well as
these of St. John and of St. Thomas, has been painted red.
beneath them, a fish of singular form is scratched into the
wall. Mid in the space between the king and the military
bishop, on the other side, there are two cavities or niches,
which were probably used as piscinae to the shrines of the
saints further on.
The whole of this series, from the
imprisoned Queen Eleanor, to the effigy of King William of
Scotland, with the exception of certain genealogical figures
near the military bishop, hereafter to be described, appears
to form a consecutive story, and to commemorate a remarkable
event in the reign of King Henry, interesting alike to the
clergy and the people of England, and peculiarly flattering
to one of the patron saints of the Priory.
The circumstance was as follows:-
In the year A.D. 1175, great
dissensions arose between King Henry and his sons, who were
encouraged in their rebellion by their mother Queen Eleanor.
The Queen in consequence, was placed in confinement, and
continued a prisoner, as we have already stated, for most of
the remainder of her husband's life.Henry's sons being
supported by the kings of France and of Scotland, and by
other powerful chieftains, King Henry prepared for war, and
resolved to combat his enemies, both at home and abroad.
While still lingering in Normandy, William the Lion of
Scotland made an incursion into the northern counties, where
he committed great ravages; when Geoffrey, bishop elect of
Lincoln, and afterwards Archbishop of York, a natural son of
King Henry by the fair Rosamond, putting himself at the head
of a body of troops, arrested the progress of the invaders.
Henry now found it high time to return to Eng1and; and
immediately after his arrival hastened to the shrine of St.
Thomas a Becket, already become the favourite saint of
England..Here he performed a most severe penance; and
having received absolution for the supposed murder of
Becket, he proceeded to London.On the very day on which
his peace had been thus made with the martyred saint,
namely, the twelfth of July, the Scottish king, resting in
security at Alnwick, and amusing himself with his companions
at a tilting match, was suddenly surprised by a body of
English knights, and after a vigorous resistance, was thrown
from his horse and made prisoner. The news of this capture
filled Henry, and all the loyal part of the nation, with
joy, as it entirely broke up the hostile confederacy against
him.
On the tenth of August of the following
year, being St. Laurence's day, which is indicated by the
figure of the saint just above him,-King William did homage
for his crown to the English monarch, and the Scottish
prelates at the same time acknowledged the supremacy of the
English Church.The latter event must have been very
acceptable to the whole of the English clergy, but
especially to the monks of Royston, who were under the
patronage of the saint to whose miraculous assistance this
extraordinary success was ascribed.
We may remark, that these groups have
been differently construed by Stukeley and Parkin. The
latter against all probability, maintains that the.
frightened monarch represents the Emperor Decius, in whose
reign he places the martyrdom of St. Laurence; concluding as
strangely, that the military bishop represents Pope Sextus,
a contemporary saint.Stukeley, on the other hand,
concludes that Louis VII of France is the monarch intended;
and supposes that this figure commemorates his precipitate
retreat on St. Laurence's day, from the siege of Verneuil.
The recent discovery of the initials on the breast of the
figure, seems, however, to settle this question.
XIII. RICHARD COEUR DE LION AND QUEEN
BERENGARIA.
Returning to the group, beneath the
figure of St. Katharine and the High Altar, we perceive two
royal personages represented on a smaller scale than the
effigies above them. As they trench upon the tablet of the
High Altar, we may conclude that they are of a, somewhat
later date. The king stands clad in complete armour, wearing
his crown, and resting his right hand on a large kite shaped
shield, marked with a fanciful device. The queen, who is
only of three quarters length, appears on the other side of
the shield. A crown is placed above her head, but scarcely
seems to touch it, and a veil descends from her, head dress,
on either side, down to her shoulder She wears an elegant
stomacher, adorned with a collar and a brooch; and her whole
costume resembles the style and fashion of royal ladies of
the twelfth century. Ranging on the same side with the king,
is the small crucifix already alluded to, exhibiting the
same scene as the altar above and beneath it is the holy
sepulchre, represented by a Norman arch, in the interior of
which is carved, in single line, a small heart, and a large
heart In double lines, (a heart of hearts,) emblematic of
intense devotion; while beneath them is a band engraved with
a heart, indicative of dedication to some special service.
We can scarcely doubt that these
figures and symbols import a vow to take the cross.
They may either represent King Henry
II. who took the vow, though he never went to the crusade;
in which case the lady will be Queen Eleanor; whose disgrace
and imprisonment, however, make this supposition less
likely. Or, far more probably, King Richard L, Coeur de
Lion, the most distinguished crusader of his age, and Queen
Berengaria, whom he married, and caused to be crowned on his
way to the Holy Land. But this lady was never crowned in
England, and after her husband's death, her rights as queen
dowager were for some time denied by her brother in law,
King John; a circumstance which may own selection of the
worthies for whom these portraits were possibly intended,
though it is not denied, that there may be some later
interpolations among them:
1.Eustace de Merks, founder of the
original chapel or canonry, and lord of the manor of
Newsells.
2.Ralph de Rochester, principal
founder of the Priory, and also lord of the manor, of
Newsells.
3. Hawysia, his wife.
4. William de Rochester, his
heir.
5. Alicia de Scales, daughter
of Ralph, and afterwards lady of the manor.
6. Richard de Clare, Count of
Gloucester, afterwards lord of the manor.
7. Waren de Bassingbourne,
8.Reginald de Argentein,
9.Margaret, Countess,
10 Juliana,
11.Ralph de Reed,
12.Robert de Burn,
And last, not least, as
being members of the first noble family, lords in
capite of the manor of Newsells,
13.Geoffrey do Magnaville,
husband of Lady Rosia.
14.Lady Rosia herself.
15.William de Magnaville, the
distinguished crusader, and possibly founder of the oratory.
XV. THE PEDIGREE.
It remains only to allude to certain
figures between the effigy of the military bishop, and that
of King William of Scotland, erroneously supposed by
Stukeley to be a crucifix, but which, on closer inspection,
appears rather to be a genealogical succession.Their
crowded position in this spot, as well as their subject, may
certainly raise a presumption of their being a subsequent
addition. The figures of this group represent a line of
three descents, one below the other, a female at the top,
then a male, and a full length female at the bottom.Whatever be their date, they certainly resemble both in form
and costume, the ladies on the other side of the Cave.On
the podium or bench immediately beneath them, is engraved a
sepulchral slab of two sides, on one of which is the figure
of a man, and on the other, that of a woman. By the side of
the genealogical stem there is also a family picture in
miniature of three youths, who probably represent the
children of the surviving lady.We may conclude that the
whole gives us the pedigree of this lady, and the interment
of an ancestral pair, whose obits were most likely
celebrated on this spot. And as marks of other figures are
dimly seen on the podium just by, as well as near the altar
of St. Thomas a Becket, it seems probable, that in these
cases also, obits were performed in the Cave.
THE HERMITAGE.
We offer but one word more on the
question of the Hermitage, which was the subject of another
warm dispute between Stukeley and Parkin. The idea of a
hermitage in this place after the death of Lady Rosia was
rejected by Stukeley as altogether inconsistent with his
theory of the origin and use of the Cave.Parkin, who had
no such chimeras to defend, maintained the continued
existence of a hermitage on this spot, even from Saxon
times; and he supported his opinion by the express recital
of a deed which conveyed the Priory property to the Chester
family. Stukeley, notwithstanding, ridiculed the notion ofhermitage in the midst of a town; and Parkin replied to this
objection by citing several instances of hermitages so
situated. During the whole of the controversy, the matter
rested in mere conjecture.A fortunate discovery, however,
has recently confirmed the opinion of Parkin. For although
he appears to have mistaken a later grant from Edward VI,
which notices a hermitage, for an earlier grant of Henry
VIII, in which no hermitage is mentioned; and although the
hermitage recited in Edward's grant, being described as in
the manor of Hedley, and. in the parish of Barkway, could
not have meant a hermitage at Royston, which was in the
manor of Newsells, and in Edward's reign had become an
independent parish: yet he was right in the main fact, of a
hermitage actually existing at Royston.
This fact has been ascertained from an
entry in the old churchwarden's book of the parish of
Bassingbourne, which extends as far back as the reign of'
Henry VII; and among other most curious details, contains a
record under date of A.D. 1506, of the 'Gyft of 20d'
rec-d 'Off a Hermytt depting at Roisten Iy8pysh.'It is true, that this entry does not
absolutely fix the residence of this hermit at the Cave. But
beside the improbability of there being two hermitages in so
small a town; the position of the Cave being exactly across
the line which, in that reign, separated the parish of
Barkway from the parish of Bassingbourne, shows that a
hermit dying on that spot, would be correctly described as
departing within the limits of the latter parish; and
the existence of a cell above the Cave, moreover, seems
almost a necessary consequence of its close proximity to the
road, and its having two shafts opening up to the surface.
This inference is also corroborated by an old manorial
survey, made about seventy years after the dissolution of
the Priory, which distinctly recognises the spot as
belonging to the lord of the manor, and records the building
of the Mercat House, in a way to help the conclusion, that
it probably occupied the site of an older building. This
survey is dated A.D. 1610, and contains the following
memorandum:
'Note: that in the myddest of Icknell
Street aforesaid, and at the west end of the same street,
there is a 'Fayr House or Crosse- buylded up
by the Lorde of the said manor, and the whole Township for a
Clock House, and a Prison House, for the use and benefit of
the whole Parish, on both sydes, as well for Cambri4geshire
as for Hertfordshire syde, end standing in both the said
counties.'
'By the syde-of it is wrote, The
Clock Howse, Crosse, & Prison Howse in
Icknell streete, for the whole Parishe.'
CONTINUED USE AND FINAL ABANDONMENT OF
THE ORATORY.
Our investigations thus far, have led
us to the conclusion, that the dedication of the ancient
Cave to the purpose of a Christian oratory, and the
execution of the greater part of its sculptures, may be
assigned, with greatest probability, to the period of the
Crusades, and. about the reigns of Henry II and Richard
Coeur de Lion.We have been obliged, notwithstanding, to
dismiss Dr. Stukeley's fanciful theory in favour of Lady
Rosia, as inconsistent with probability; and on that subject
we have now only to add the testimony of Leland, that she
was really buried at Chickesand, in Bedfordshire, in a
nunnery there, founded by herself; and where she spent the
close of her life -in religious seclusion.Our concluding
remarks will also furnish a satisfactory account of the
skull and other human bones discovered in the loose earth,
which afterwards filled the Cave.
The frequency of the religious services
celebrated in this oratory, must of course be open to
conjecture.We may, perhaps, infer that they were limited
to the great festivals of the church, and the holidays of
the particular saints who figure in it; to the obits of
benefactors; to occasional masses for distinguished pilgrims
and visitors; and to the private devotions of the resident
hermit or hermits. We have as little certainty as to the
religious order to which the hermit of the Cave belonged.
But it seems probable that as the monks of the Priory
belonged to the order of St. Augustine, the Augustine
Eremites would be preferred for the service of the oratory.
That the Cave was used for religious
purposes long after the time of Richard I. does not admit of
reasonable doubt; but the exact period of its abandonment is
not so certain.It has been supposed by some, that this
event occurred in the reign of Henry IV, when the town was
almost consumed by fire. But the careful filling up of the
place argues a deliberate purpose. There is little question,
indeed, that the Cave was open until the period of the
Reformation, when it passed, with other ecclesiastical
property, info the hands of tile Crown; and on its
subsequent transfer to the Chester family, being no longer
required for superstitious services, and useless for any
other, it underwent the common fate of the Priory and the
Free Chapel of St. Nicholas, and was shortly after closed
and forgotten.
That this step was taken before the age
of Iconoclasm, seems highly probable, from the unmutilated
condition of the principal figures; And as the age of the
Reformation was one in which such desecrations were too
frequent to attract particular notice, or to leave behind
any vivid impressions, it will best explain the oblivion
into which the very existence of the Cave, as well as the
exact sites of the Priory, and of the Free Chapel of St.
Nicholas, speedily fell. We-may conclude, that at the same
time the ancient cross itself disappeared.This period will
also account most satisfactorily for the mode of filling up
the Cave, as well as. for the discovery of human bones and
medieval pottery; for then it was, that the Priory and
cloisters being 'taken down, the site was appropriated to
the new manor house and gardens, the building and
arrangement of which necessarily required the removal of
much rubbish, and the clearing away of many bones. Some of
these we knew to have been afterwards deposited in the
church; but a portion of them would be very naturally
employed by the lord of the manor, to fill up the oratory,
preparatory to- the erection of the Mercat house and prison
above it. The utter contempt with which popery was
afterwards regarded, must have extinguished all do, sire on
the part of the town's people to perpetuate the memory of a
former superstition; and as they had long ceased to be
Romanists, before, they became archeologists, no further
interest was felt by any one in the subject
We offer a few concludingremarks on
the Arabic numerals recently discovered in the Cave.And,
first respecting the date of 1347, already noticed as being
in the dome.The care with which these figures are cut,
their general air of antiquity, and their obscure and almost
inaccessible position, would certainly have placed them
beyond suspicion, but for a single figure (the figure 4),
which seems open to challenge, as differing in some degree
from the usual form of the fourteenth century. Yet the
falsification of these figures seems most improbable. It is
next to certain, that neither Stukeley nor Parkin was aware
of their existence; for had they been, the former must, as a
point of honour, and the latter assuredly would, as a ground
of triumph, have adverted to them. Indeed, we have it in
proof, that no early antiquaries examined this part of the
Cave; and since their time, we can conceive of no motive,
which could prompt any one to attempt a deception.
The peculiarity in the form of this
numeral must, nevertheless, be admitted.Yet it is certain,
that such a form was occasionally used about the middle of
the fifteenth century; and the exact period when the
circular shape of the old numeral merged into the angular,
or by what gradations, if any, this was effected, is not
precisely known. It is clear that the figure here has a
transition character; and contemporaneous manuscripts exist,
which justify the belief, that as easy as the middle of the
fourteenth century, the disputed form may, in some
instances, have been used.
These, however, are not the only
ancient numerals that have been discovered. We have another
instance, just above the prison cell of St. Katharine,
apparently written by an amateur hand in old English
characters, with the name of 'Martin,' and the date of 18
February 1350; and in this case the figures themselves offer
no insuperable objection to their authenticity.Supposing
these inscriptions to be genuine, they furnish decisive
proof of the continued use of the oratory up to that time.
In regard to the numerals in the dome, they also seem to
mark the. date of certain alterations or repairs to the
eastern shaft, which we must conceive to have been then the
principal entrance; and judging from the colouring on the
block itself, we may further imagine that they indicate the
period of the painting of the figures; a practice which,
from other sources, we know to have been much in vogue in
the reign of Edward III.
If, on the other hand, we are obliged
to conclude that a fraud has been practiced, it would most
probably consist in the change of a figure 5 into the figure
3, which would then give us the year 1547 - a year
remarkable for the first act of parliament which suppressed
idolatry and superstition throughout the land. But in this
case we must also infer from the insertion of the date, that
it was done with the hope that at some further time the
oratory might be again opened and used.
However the case be decided, it will be
clear that the final exit from the Cave was made through the
northern shaft, which afterwards led to its discovery.
RECAPITULATION.
The result of our whole inquiry will
appear in the following conclusions:
- That the cave was first formed by
means of shafts, either of British or Romano British
construction, and at a period anterior to Christianity.
- That at a somewhat later period,
the cave was used as a Roman sepulchre.
3.That about the period of
the Crusades, it received the greaterpart of its
presentdecorations, and was then, if not before, converted
into a Christian oratory, to which ahermitage was probably
attached.
4.That it remained open until the Reformation,
when it was finally filled up, closed, and forgotten.
|